Harassing EV owners is slightly dumber than blockading pipelines, but mostly the same – the circle of hell created by ignorant extremism

img_5572 (1)

A new breed of idiot is running amok, in the US this time. Media reports have documented a new trend called ICE-ing (short for Internal Combustion Engine) where blockheads in big pickups purposely park their trucks in electric vehicle charging spots, blocking any EV owner from accessing power. These may be the same pioneers of the “rolling coal” hobby, whereby similar intellectual titans modify diesel pickup trucks to belch out vast quantities of soot and black smoke into the faces of cyclists and Prius drivers.

There are less-gifted people everywhere, so one might wonder what exactly provokes this fairly impressive display of brainlessness. The answer, ironically, is that these are the same calibre of over-the-top antics that we see in some elements of extreme environmental protests. Both tactics involve people who have escaped the orbit of rationality in the interests of fighting mythical opponents. Both do infinitely more harm than good.

There is no need to point out the harm that ICE-ing fools are creating; the environmental side is more subtle though. Well-financed and organized groups seek to obliterate the very fuels that keep us all alive, while offering wildly over-simplistic solutions as to how to live without those fuels. We see people chaining themselves to valves to slow progress on pipeline construction to hem in, for example, the oil sands, while at the same time the rest of the world is constructing 47,000 kilometers of pipelines and has another 140,000 km in the design phase. Most of these pipelines are in regions with environmental standards far lower than Canada’s, if they have any at all. At the same time, global oil consumption continues its relentless rise anyway, so that fuel will come from somewhere, but we don’t know where, and we don’t know the environmental footprint. This makes no sense but it happens, and then fuels sometimes irrational anger in people who can see through these tactics. If of a certain mental persuasion, these agitated folks up the ante and next thing you know a burbling diesel half-ton truck is hanging out in a Tesla supercharger parking spot.

Some get to this stage of insanity through a certain kind of mental insecurity. Sometimes we respond to attacks rather than thinking about the proper context. Suppose someone calls you stupid, despite considerable evidence to the contrary. The tendency is to fight back, to counterattack. The correct response is to mull over the possibility, asking of ourselves whether that is true or not. Any evidence, such as higher education, or a successful career/business, or whatever – should lead to the conclusion that the name caller is either mistaken or not intellectually qualified to judge stupidity, with no further thought to the issue.

But that’s not how we work. In the environmental world, this human trait is causing incalculable damage to industry and the environment, because a few key stakeholders have steered the debate in that direction.

A fairly obvious example is the single-minded focus on vilifying fossil fuel companies, any fossil fuel-related company, for causing global warming. We can ascertain fairly quickly that there is far more to it than that, with the primary evidence being the hyperactive consumptive habits of 7 billion people. That is where emissions come from.

This creates a big problem, because the attacks by the people that view elimination of fossil fuels (an umbrella which includes clean burning natural gas) as the main battlefield force people to take sides.

When people take sides, we get extremists, and extremists are like a giant blood-sucking leach on humanity. Extremists create poles of opposite polarity, create enemies w/ propaganda, and force outrageous amounts of time and resources to be spent on counterattacks.

Our goal as society and humanity should be to single-mindedly focus on efficiency, and on tackling the world’s biggest problems first, if the goal is to reduce our environmental footprint. We should use tax incentives to develop new technologies that work with the real world’s existing infrastructure. We should work to add forestry wherever we can and stop deforestation. We should adopt standards to tackle low hanging fruit, like poorly insulated windows and buildings. We should take every optional environmental dollar and send it to places in the world that have the most damaging emissions, and replace those. This would largely mean replacing global coal with global natural gas, an instant 50 percent reduction in CO2.

What we should stop doing, is attacking things mindlessly, whether it is Tesla drivers or safe and necessary energy transmission mechanisms.

 

6 Comments

  1. Scott Lang says:

    Terry, your articles refreahing and well thought out. May I suggest that you publish the same quality in more condensed and punchier format? I suspect that in shared social media format people dont read long form. Pleaae keep the articles coming.

    Like

  2. R Barbour says:

    While some find it fun to aggravate those that fix their views on certain popular ideas, there is nothing but stupidity in the acts both ICE-ING and environmental posturing. What if the environmentalists were given the opportunity to volunteer to accept limits on their own use of oil products and the ICE-ERS agreed to limit their use of electricity, we would have a serious challenge to current overuse. Perhaps the whole country needs to be rationed as happened during the world war. Charging extra for oil products does nothing for conservation; rations would assure a decrease in use.

    Like

    • Terry Etam says:

      Thanks for the note. I think something like rationing is almost a prerequisite to understanding and appreciating. It’s loke that for anything, with the exception being that poeople ant to kill the petroleum industry! Which is something else entirely.

      Like

  3. Christopher Ruud says:

    Exactly…Could not agree with you more..Really enjoy your articles..A sense of reason always..

    Like

Leave a Reply to Christopher Ruud Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: